Now partnering with enterprise compliance platforms.
The System of Record for Environmental Permitting.
OPEF provides a secure, auditable system of record for environmental permitting, enabling consistent analysis, transparent decision-making, and complete administrative records across agencies and projects.
Click any node to view its provenance and audit trail. Use Tab to navigate with keyboard.
NEPA Is a Lifecycle. Most Tools Treat It Like a Document.
Fragmented delivery
Consultants, studies, and agencies operate across disconnected artifacts without a shared, auditable workspace.
→Drives 00–00 year review cycles
Deadlines + record risk
Consultation timelines slip, rationale gets buried, and the administrative record becomes hard to defend under scrutiny.
→0%0% miss statutory timelines
Mitigation doesn’t land
Commitments are approved in documents but fail to translate into operational controls, owners, and monitoring.
→$0M+$0M+ per EIS in rework and coordination
From Static Reports to a Living Compliance Record
OPEF replaces document-centric workflows with structured NEPA intelligence. Every statement, decision, and commitment is traceable to evidence, law, and outcomes.
Claim
→
Evidence
→
Decision
→
Mitigation
→
Outcome
Everything Required to Run NEPA in One System
Four workspaces align to how teams actually execute NEPA: screening, drafting, alternatives, and public engagement. They run on a single source of truth for evidence and citations, backed by a knowledge base that keeps decisions consistent and reviewable.
CATEX Screening
DOE-style CX register and record workspace with required rationale and exportable determinations.
CX Register
CX-2024-001DOE CX determinationApproved
CX-2024-002DOE CX determinationReview
CX-2024-003DOE CX determinationApproved
DOE CX code entry loads official definitions + integral elements
Extraordinary circumstances gates with required basis statements
Recommendation logic (Conditional CX / EA Suggested) based on record flags
EA / EIS Drafting
Draft EIS workspace with outline, editor, and review controls, built for traceable iteration.
Draft EIS Editor
Cover
Summary
Purpose
Evidence chip added • Audit trail updated
Template insertion via slash commands
Evidence citations via @ insertion UI
Inline comments for reviewer workflows
Alternatives Compare
Alternatives register with compare mode and export, designed for consistent, reviewable comparisons.
Alternatives Compare
Resource
Alt A
Alt B
No Action
Air
Moderate
Low
None
Water
Low
Low
None
Wildlife
Moderate
Moderate
None
Alternatives register with compare mode
Field-by-field comparison across alternatives
Export action for downstream use
Public Engagement
Comments workspace with KPI views, issue grouping, and detail panels, structured for linkage to responses and decisions.
Public Comments
Water Quality Concerns23pending
Wildlife Habitat18drafting
Traffic & Noise12complete
Comment period banner + KPI tiles
Issue-grouped views and detail panels
Administrative record structure designed for audit and review
Single Source of Truth
A unified evidence library and citation registry across screening, drafting, and comments, with provenance built in.
Evidence Registry
Wetlands delineation reportsource
Noise study dataset (v3)dataset
USFWS consultation letterrecord
Citation registry updated • Provenance captured
Evidence and citations shared across workflows
Provenance, ownership, and audit logs by default
Reviewer-ready exports with traceable sources
Knowledge Base
Searchable precedent, agency guidance, and project artifacts that help teams reuse prior work without losing defensibility.
Knowledge Base
Search: “extraordinary circumstances”
CEQ guidance excerptguidance
Prior EA: mitigation languageprecedent
Agency memo templatetemplate
Precedent search with source context
Guidance surfaced in the moment of drafting
Consistent decisions across projects and teams
Designed for Speed Without Sacrificing Defensibility
Modeled ranges based on federal data and pilot interviews.
Faster drafting
00–0%0%
Modeled range, conservative.
Lower document-heavy costs
00–0%0%
Modeled range, conservative.
Traceability
0%0%
Modeled range, conservative.
Months shaved off timelines
00
Modeled range, conservative.
Built for High-Impact Federal AI Use
Controls
Governance-first defaults for high-stakes review.
Human review gates
Documented model limits
Full audit logs
Evidence-linked outputs
Transparency
Built to hold up in audit, litigation, and public record contexts.
Transparent sourcing
Risk management controls
Analyst-tool positioning
Public-record safe by design
Who it’s for
High-accountability teams that need strong records, clear review gates, and a defensible trail from evidence to decision to mitigation.
Federal and regional agencies
Program offices and NEPA staff managing consultation, review, and public record requirements.
Large consulting firms
Multi-project delivery teams that need consistent quality, traceable citations, and reviewer coordination.
Infrastructure sponsors and EPCs
Owners who need commitments translated into operational controls, assignments, and monitoring.
Program leaders and investors
Decision-makers tracking timeline risk, defensibility, and readiness across portfolios.
If NEPA Is Gating Your Project, OPEF Is the Key.
Federal-ready • Audit-first • Built for real decisions